Beazer Homes vs D.R. Horton

Purchase agreement comparison

Overview

Beazer Homes and D.R. Horton are both national homebuilders that compete in multiple U.S. markets. Buyers in states where both builders operate — including Texas, Florida, Arizona, California, Georgia — may find themselves comparing the two when choosing a new construction home.

Both builders use standardized purchase agreements that contain clauses affecting buyer rights and remedies. This comparison examines documented contract patterns, legal history, and key differences based on publicly available information.

The presence of a contract clause does not mean it appears in every agreement from that builder. Contract terms may vary by state, community, and transaction. This comparison is intended to help buyers ask informed questions, not to recommend one builder over the other.

At a Glance

Beazer HomesD.R. Horton
Market PositionNational homebuilder focused on entry-level and move-up homesLargest homebuilder in the United States by volume
TickerNYSE: BZHNYSE: DHI
HeadquartersAtlanta, GeorgiaArlington, Texas
Affiliated LenderNo current captive lenderDHI Mortgage
Documented Clauses1411
Documented Cases78

Contract Clause Comparison

The following comparison shows documented contract patterns for each builder. A check mark indicates the clause type has been documented; it does not mean it appears in every contract.

Beazer Homes:
D.R. Horton:

Both Beazer Homes and D.R. Horton include restrictive limited warranty language in their documented contract patterns. Buyers considering either builder should be aware that this clause type has been identified in purchase agreements from both companies.

Beazer Homes:
D.R. Horton:

Beazer Homes has been documented using warranty voiding conditions provisions, while D.R. Horton does not have this pattern documented in available contract analyses. This represents a difference in contract risk profiles between the two builders.

Beazer Homes:
D.R. Horton:

Both Beazer Homes and D.R. Horton include daily closing penalty language in their documented contract patterns. Buyers considering either builder should be aware that this clause type has been identified in purchase agreements from both companies.

Beazer Homes:
D.R. Horton:

Beazer Homes has been documented using certificate of occupancy override provisions, while D.R. Horton does not have this pattern documented in available contract analyses. This represents a difference in contract risk profiles between the two builders.

Beazer Homes:
D.R. Horton:

Both Beazer Homes and D.R. Horton include punch list / post-closing repair limitation language in their documented contract patterns. Buyers considering either builder should be aware that this clause type has been identified in purchase agreements from both companies.

Beazer Homes:
D.R. Horton:

Both Beazer Homes and D.R. Horton include independent inspection restriction language in their documented contract patterns. Buyers considering either builder should be aware that this clause type has been identified in purchase agreements from both companies.

Beazer Homes:
D.R. Horton:

Both Beazer Homes and D.R. Horton include material substitution without consent language in their documented contract patterns. Buyers considering either builder should be aware that this clause type has been identified in purchase agreements from both companies.

Beazer Homes:
D.R. Horton:

Beazer Homes has been documented using preferred lender steering / incentive lock provisions, while D.R. Horton does not have this pattern documented in available contract analyses. This represents a difference in contract risk profiles between the two builders.

Beazer Homes:
D.R. Horton:

Both Beazer Homes and D.R. Horton include mandatory binding arbitration language in their documented contract patterns. Buyers considering either builder should be aware that this clause type has been identified in purchase agreements from both companies.

Beazer Homes:
D.R. Horton:

Both Beazer Homes and D.R. Horton include class action lawsuit waiver language in their documented contract patterns. Buyers considering either builder should be aware that this clause type has been identified in purchase agreements from both companies.

Beazer Homes:
D.R. Horton:

Both Beazer Homes and D.R. Horton include implied warranty of habitability waiver language in their documented contract patterns. Buyers considering either builder should be aware that this clause type has been identified in purchase agreements from both companies.

Beazer Homes:
D.R. Horton:

Both Beazer Homes and D.R. Horton include deposit forfeiture / earnest money trap language in their documented contract patterns. Buyers considering either builder should be aware that this clause type has been identified in purchase agreements from both companies.

Beazer Homes:
D.R. Horton:

Both Beazer Homes and D.R. Horton include limitation of liability / no monetary damages language in their documented contract patterns. Buyers considering either builder should be aware that this clause type has been identified in purchase agreements from both companies.

Beazer Homes:
D.R. Horton:

Both Beazer Homes and D.R. Horton include monthly payment suppression / hidden costs language in their documented contract patterns. Buyers considering either builder should be aware that this clause type has been identified in purchase agreements from both companies.

Legal History Comparison

Both builders have documented litigation histories. Beazer Homes has 7 documented cases and investigations; D.R. Horton has 8. The nature and focus of litigation differs between the two builders.

Beazer Homes

  • United States v. Beazer Homes — $50M False Claims Act settlement for mortgage fraud
  • Criminal fraud conviction of VP Michael T. Rand
  • SEC clawback actions against CEO and CFO
  • EPA Clean Water Act settlement

D.R. Horton

  • Smith v. D.R. Horton (SC Supreme Court, 2016) — Multiple contract provisions found unconscionable
  • Two active payment suppression lawsuits (Robinson, Santiago — 2025)
  • $16.1M construction defect settlement in South Carolina
  • Hunterbrook Media investigation into lending practices

Both Beazer Homes and D.R. Horton have faced litigation related to construction practices and contract terms. Buyers should review the full builder profiles for detailed case information and consider how each builder's legal history may reflect patterns relevant to current purchase agreements.

States Where Both Builders Operate

Texas
Florida
Arizona
California
Georgia
North Carolina
South Carolina
Tennessee
Virginia
Maryland
Nevada

Key Differences

Market Position

Beazer Homes is positioned as national homebuilder focused on entry-level and move-up homes. D.R. Horton is positioned as largest homebuilder in the united states by volume.

Documented Contract Patterns

Beazer Homes has 14 documented clause types in our analysis; D.R. Horton has 11. Beazer Homes has a broader set of documented contract patterns, though this does not necessarily indicate greater risk — it may reflect more extensive public documentation.

Affiliated Lender

Beazer Homes uses No current captive lender as its affiliated lender. D.R. Horton uses DHI Mortgage. Both builders offer incentives to use their affiliated lenders, which may affect financing terms and closing costs.

Geographic Overlap

Beazer Homes operates in 13 states; D.R. Horton operates in 15 states. They share 11 states where buyers may be choosing between the two.

Litigation History

Beazer Homes has 7 documented cases and investigations; D.R. Horton has 8. The nature and severity of litigation differs between the two builders — review the legal history section for details.

What Buyers Should Consider

Both contracts require careful review.

Whether you are buying from Beazer Homes or D.R. Horton, the purchase agreement contains clauses that may limit your rights. Both builders use standardized contracts that favor the builder.

Check your state's specific protections.

The enforceability of many contract clauses depends on state law. A clause that was struck down in one state may be enforceable in another. Review the state-specific analysis for your location.

Compare affiliated lender terms independently.

Both builders offer incentives to use their affiliated lenders. Get independent quotes from at least two outside lenders before committing, and verify that all quoted payments include taxes, insurance, and HOA fees.

Do not assume one builder's contract is inherently safer.

Both builders use similar clause types. The differences are in specific language and implementation. An independent contract review can identify the specific risks in whichever agreement you are considering.

Read the full Beazer Homes contract review →Read the full D.R. Horton contract review →Scan your contract →

Have a Beazer Homes or D.R. Horton contract?

Get a personalized analysis at fineprint.homes — $49

Scan Your Contract
This article is for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice. Consult a licensed attorney in your state before making legal decisions.