Purchase agreement comparison
Lennar and Richmond American Homes are both homebuilders that compete in multiple U.S. markets. Buyers in states where both builders operate — including Colorado, Arizona, Nevada, California, Florida, Maryland, Virginia — may find themselves comparing the two when choosing a new construction home.
Both builders use standardized purchase agreements that contain clauses affecting buyer rights and remedies. This comparison examines documented contract patterns, legal history, and key differences based on publicly available information.
The presence of a contract clause does not mean it appears in every agreement from that builder. Contract terms may vary by state, community, and transaction. This comparison is intended to help buyers ask informed questions, not to recommend one builder over the other.
| Lennar | Richmond American Homes | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Position | One of the largest homebuilders in the United States by revenue | National homebuilder with strong presence in the Western United States |
| Ticker | NYSE: LEN | NYSE: MDC |
| Headquarters | Miami, Florida | Denver, Colorado |
| Affiliated Lender | Lennar Mortgage | HomeAmerican Mortgage |
| Documented Clauses | 10 | 9 |
| Documented Cases | 6 | 3 |
The following comparison shows documented contract patterns for each builder. A check mark indicates the clause type has been documented; it does not mean it appears in every contract.
Both builders have documented litigation histories. Lennar has 6 documented cases and investigations; Richmond American Homes has 3. The nature and focus of litigation differs between the two builders.
Both Lennar and Richmond American Homes have faced litigation related to construction practices and contract terms. Buyers should review the full builder profiles for detailed case information and consider how each builder's legal history may reflect patterns relevant to current purchase agreements.
Lennar is positioned as largest homebuilders in the united states by revenue. Richmond American Homes is positioned as national homebuilder with strong presence in the western united states.
Lennar has 10 documented clause types in our analysis; Richmond American Homes has 9. Lennar has a broader set of documented contract patterns, though this does not necessarily indicate greater risk — it may reflect more extensive public documentation.
Lennar uses Lennar Mortgage as its affiliated lender. Richmond American Homes uses HomeAmerican Mortgage. Both builders offer incentives to use their affiliated lenders, which may affect financing terms and closing costs.
Lennar operates in 14 states; Richmond American Homes operates in 7 states. They share 7 states where buyers may be choosing between the two.
Lennar has 6 documented cases and investigations; Richmond American Homes has 3. The nature and severity of litigation differs between the two builders — review the legal history section for details.
Both contracts require careful review.
Whether you are buying from Lennar or Richmond American Homes, the purchase agreement contains clauses that may limit your rights. Both builders use standardized contracts that favor the builder.
Check your state's specific protections.
The enforceability of many contract clauses depends on state law. A clause that was struck down in one state may be enforceable in another. Review the state-specific analysis for your location.
Compare affiliated lender terms independently.
Both builders offer incentives to use their affiliated lenders. Get independent quotes from at least two outside lenders before committing, and verify that all quoted payments include taxes, insurance, and HOA fees.
Do not assume one builder's contract is inherently safer.
Both builders use similar clause types. The differences are in specific language and implementation. An independent contract review can identify the specific risks in whichever agreement you are considering.
Have a Lennar or Richmond American Homes contract?
Get a personalized analysis at fineprint.homes — $49
Scan Your Contract