Lennar and Taylor Morrison are both national homebuilders that compete in multiple U.S. markets. Buyers in states where both builders operate — including Texas, Florida, California, Arizona, Colorado — may find themselves comparing the two when choosing a new construction home.
Both builders use standardized purchase agreements that contain clauses affecting buyer rights and remedies. This comparison examines documented contract patterns, legal history, and key differences based on publicly available information.
The presence of a contract clause does not mean it appears in every agreement from that builder. Contract terms may vary by state, community, and transaction. This comparison is intended to help buyers ask informed questions, not to recommend one builder over the other.
At a Glance
Lennar
Taylor Morrison
Market Position
Second-largest homebuilder in the United States
Top-10 national homebuilder
Ticker
NYSE: LEN
NYSE: TMHC
Headquarters
Miami, Florida
Scottsdale, Arizona
Affiliated Lender
Lennar Mortgage (formerly Eagle Home Mortgage)
Taylor Morrison Home Funding
Documented Clauses
10
10
Documented Cases
6
7
Contract Clause Comparison
The following comparison shows documented contract patterns for each builder. A check mark indicates the clause type has been documented; it does not mean it appears in every contract.
Lennar has been documented using daily closing penalty provisions, while Taylor Morrison does not have this pattern documented in available contract analyses. This represents a difference in contract risk profiles between the two builders.
Lennar has been documented using certificate of occupancy override provisions, while Taylor Morrison does not have this pattern documented in available contract analyses. This represents a difference in contract risk profiles between the two builders.
Lennar has been documented using independent inspection restriction provisions, while Taylor Morrison does not have this pattern documented in available contract analyses. This represents a difference in contract risk profiles between the two builders.
Both Lennar and Taylor Morrison include material substitution without consent language in their documented contract patterns. Buyers considering either builder should be aware that this clause type has been identified in purchase agreements from both companies.
Both Lennar and Taylor Morrison include restrictive limited warranty language in their documented contract patterns. Buyers considering either builder should be aware that this clause type has been identified in purchase agreements from both companies.
Both Lennar and Taylor Morrison include warranty voiding conditions language in their documented contract patterns. Buyers considering either builder should be aware that this clause type has been identified in purchase agreements from both companies.
Taylor Morrison has been documented using preferred lender steering / incentive lock provisions, while Lennar does not have this pattern documented in available contract analyses. This represents a difference in contract risk profiles between the two builders.
Both Lennar and Taylor Morrison include implied warranty of habitability waiver language in their documented contract patterns. Buyers considering either builder should be aware that this clause type has been identified in purchase agreements from both companies.
Both Lennar and Taylor Morrison include mandatory binding arbitration language in their documented contract patterns. Buyers considering either builder should be aware that this clause type has been identified in purchase agreements from both companies.
Both Lennar and Taylor Morrison include class action lawsuit waiver language in their documented contract patterns. Buyers considering either builder should be aware that this clause type has been identified in purchase agreements from both companies.
Both Lennar and Taylor Morrison include deposit forfeiture / earnest money trap language in their documented contract patterns. Buyers considering either builder should be aware that this clause type has been identified in purchase agreements from both companies.
Taylor Morrison has been documented using limitation of liability / no monetary damages provisions, while Lennar does not have this pattern documented in available contract analyses. This represents a difference in contract risk profiles between the two builders.
Taylor Morrison has been documented using monthly payment suppression / hidden costs provisions, while Lennar does not have this pattern documented in available contract analyses. This represents a difference in contract risk profiles between the two builders.
Legal History Comparison
Both builders have documented litigation histories. Lennar has 6 documented cases and investigations; Taylor Morrison has 7. The nature and focus of litigation differs between the two builders.
Lennar
Damico v. Lennar Carolinas (SC Supreme Court, 2022) — Arbitration found unconscionable
Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Lennar alleging 552 defective homes (2025)
$13.2M Eagle Home Mortgage whistleblower settlement (2019)
LaMorada construction defect lawsuits in Florida
Taylor Morrison
Multiple Texas lawsuits (Ha, Skufca, Kohlmeyer) seeking to compel arbitration
Wiener v. Taylor Morrison — TCPA class action over telemarketing
Alaqua Lakes Community Association construction defect litigation
Solivita club membership fee class action
Both Lennar and Taylor Morrison have faced litigation related to construction practices and contract terms. Buyers should review the full builder profiles for detailed case information and consider how each builder's legal history may reflect patterns relevant to current purchase agreements.
Lennar is positioned as second-largest homebuilder in the united states. Taylor Morrison is positioned as top-10 national homebuilder.
Affiliated Lender
Lennar uses Lennar Mortgage (formerly Eagle Home Mortgage) as its affiliated lender. Taylor Morrison uses Taylor Morrison Home Funding. Both builders offer incentives to use their affiliated lenders, which may affect financing terms and closing costs.
Geographic Overlap
Lennar operates in 22 states; Taylor Morrison operates in 10 states. They share 10 states where buyers may be choosing between the two.
Litigation History
Lennar has 6 documented cases and investigations; Taylor Morrison has 7. The nature and severity of litigation differs between the two builders — review the legal history section for details.
What Buyers Should Consider
Both contracts require careful review.
Whether you are buying from Lennar or Taylor Morrison, the purchase agreement contains clauses that may limit your rights. Both builders use standardized contracts that favor the builder.
Check your state's specific protections.
The enforceability of many contract clauses depends on state law. A clause that was struck down in one state may be enforceable in another. Review the state-specific analysis for your location.
Compare affiliated lender terms independently.
Both builders offer incentives to use their affiliated lenders. Get independent quotes from at least two outside lenders before committing, and verify that all quoted payments include taxes, insurance, and HOA fees.
Do not assume one builder's contract is inherently safer.
Both builders use similar clause types. The differences are in specific language and implementation. An independent contract review can identify the specific risks in whichever agreement you are considering.
This article is for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice. Consult a licensed attorney in your state before making legal decisions.