PulteGroup and Taylor Morrison are both national homebuilders that compete in multiple U.S. markets. Buyers in states where both builders operate — including Texas, Florida, California, Arizona, Georgia — may find themselves comparing the two when choosing a new construction home.
Both builders use standardized purchase agreements that contain clauses affecting buyer rights and remedies. This comparison examines documented contract patterns, legal history, and key differences based on publicly available information.
The presence of a contract clause does not mean it appears in every agreement from that builder. Contract terms may vary by state, community, and transaction. This comparison is intended to help buyers ask informed questions, not to recommend one builder over the other.
At a Glance
PulteGroup
Taylor Morrison
Market Position
Third-largest homebuilder in the United States
Top-10 national homebuilder
Ticker
NYSE: PHM
NYSE: TMHC
Headquarters
Atlanta, Georgia
Scottsdale, Arizona
Affiliated Lender
Pulte Mortgage
Taylor Morrison Home Funding
Documented Clauses
13
10
Documented Cases
8
7
Contract Clause Comparison
The following comparison shows documented contract patterns for each builder. A check mark indicates the clause type has been documented; it does not mean it appears in every contract.
Both PulteGroup and Taylor Morrison include preferred lender steering / incentive lock language in their documented contract patterns. Buyers considering either builder should be aware that this clause type has been identified in purchase agreements from both companies.
Both PulteGroup and Taylor Morrison include material substitution without consent language in their documented contract patterns. Buyers considering either builder should be aware that this clause type has been identified in purchase agreements from both companies.
Both PulteGroup and Taylor Morrison include restrictive limited warranty language in their documented contract patterns. Buyers considering either builder should be aware that this clause type has been identified in purchase agreements from both companies.
Both PulteGroup and Taylor Morrison include warranty voiding conditions language in their documented contract patterns. Buyers considering either builder should be aware that this clause type has been identified in purchase agreements from both companies.
PulteGroup has been documented using daily closing penalty provisions, while Taylor Morrison does not have this pattern documented in available contract analyses. This represents a difference in contract risk profiles between the two builders.
PulteGroup has been documented using independent inspection restriction provisions, while Taylor Morrison does not have this pattern documented in available contract analyses. This represents a difference in contract risk profiles between the two builders.
PulteGroup has been documented using certificate of occupancy override provisions, while Taylor Morrison does not have this pattern documented in available contract analyses. This represents a difference in contract risk profiles between the two builders.
PulteGroup has been documented using punch list / post-closing repair limitation provisions, while Taylor Morrison does not have this pattern documented in available contract analyses. This represents a difference in contract risk profiles between the two builders.
Both PulteGroup and Taylor Morrison include mandatory binding arbitration language in their documented contract patterns. Buyers considering either builder should be aware that this clause type has been identified in purchase agreements from both companies.
Both PulteGroup and Taylor Morrison include class action lawsuit waiver language in their documented contract patterns. Buyers considering either builder should be aware that this clause type has been identified in purchase agreements from both companies.
Both PulteGroup and Taylor Morrison include implied warranty of habitability waiver language in their documented contract patterns. Buyers considering either builder should be aware that this clause type has been identified in purchase agreements from both companies.
Both PulteGroup and Taylor Morrison include deposit forfeiture / earnest money trap language in their documented contract patterns. Buyers considering either builder should be aware that this clause type has been identified in purchase agreements from both companies.
Both PulteGroup and Taylor Morrison include limitation of liability / no monetary damages language in their documented contract patterns. Buyers considering either builder should be aware that this clause type has been identified in purchase agreements from both companies.
Taylor Morrison has been documented using monthly payment suppression / hidden costs provisions, while PulteGroup does not have this pattern documented in available contract analyses. This represents a difference in contract risk profiles between the two builders.
Legal History Comparison
Both builders have documented litigation histories. PulteGroup has 8 documented cases and investigations; Taylor Morrison has 7. The nature and focus of litigation differs between the two builders.
PulteGroup
Florida AG settlement over stucco defects
Arizona AG settlement over earnest money and consumer fraud
Del Webb Sun City Grand construction defect litigation
EPA Clean Water Act settlement
Taylor Morrison
Multiple Texas lawsuits (Ha, Skufca, Kohlmeyer) seeking to compel arbitration
Wiener v. Taylor Morrison — TCPA class action over telemarketing
Alaqua Lakes Community Association construction defect litigation
Solivita club membership fee class action
Both PulteGroup and Taylor Morrison have faced litigation related to construction practices and contract terms. Buyers should review the full builder profiles for detailed case information and consider how each builder's legal history may reflect patterns relevant to current purchase agreements.
PulteGroup is positioned as third-largest homebuilder in the united states. Taylor Morrison is positioned as top-10 national homebuilder.
Documented Contract Patterns
PulteGroup has 13 documented clause types in our analysis; Taylor Morrison has 10. PulteGroup has a broader set of documented contract patterns, though this does not necessarily indicate greater risk — it may reflect more extensive public documentation.
Affiliated Lender
PulteGroup uses Pulte Mortgage as its affiliated lender. Taylor Morrison uses Taylor Morrison Home Funding. Both builders offer incentives to use their affiliated lenders, which may affect financing terms and closing costs.
Geographic Overlap
PulteGroup operates in 24 states; Taylor Morrison operates in 10 states. They share 9 states where buyers may be choosing between the two.
Litigation History
PulteGroup has 8 documented cases and investigations; Taylor Morrison has 7. The nature and severity of litigation differs between the two builders — review the legal history section for details.
What Buyers Should Consider
Both contracts require careful review.
Whether you are buying from PulteGroup or Taylor Morrison, the purchase agreement contains clauses that may limit your rights. Both builders use standardized contracts that favor the builder.
Check your state's specific protections.
The enforceability of many contract clauses depends on state law. A clause that was struck down in one state may be enforceable in another. Review the state-specific analysis for your location.
Compare affiliated lender terms independently.
Both builders offer incentives to use their affiliated lenders. Get independent quotes from at least two outside lenders before committing, and verify that all quoted payments include taxes, insurance, and HOA fees.
Do not assume one builder's contract is inherently safer.
Both builders use similar clause types. The differences are in specific language and implementation. An independent contract review can identify the specific risks in whichever agreement you are considering.
This article is for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice. Consult a licensed attorney in your state before making legal decisions.