Overview
M/I Homes operates in South Carolina as part of its Southeast presence.
South Carolina's implied warranty of habitability, right-to-repair statute, and the Unfair Trade Practices Act create a legal framework that may provide protections beyond those in the M/I Homes purchase agreement. The South Carolina Supreme Court has found habitability waiver clauses unconscionable in cases involving national builders.
How South Carolina Law Affects Your Contract
The following analysis examines how M/I Homes's documented contract patterns interact with South Carolina consumer protection law.
Implied Warranty of Habitability
South Carolina courts recognize an implied warranty of habitability for new construction (Lane v. Trenholm Building Co., 229 S.C. 25, 1956). The South Carolina Supreme Court found habitability waiver clauses unconscionable in Smith v. D.R. Horton (2016). If M/I Homes' purchase agreement attempts to waive implied warranties, it may face similar challenges.
Notice and Opportunity to Cure (Right to Repair)
South Carolina Code § 40-59-840 et seq. requires homeowners to provide written notice to the builder and allow an opportunity to inspect and offer a repair before filing a construction defect lawsuit.
Arbitration Provisions Under South Carolina Law
Mandatory arbitration clauses have been found unconscionable in some South Carolina cases involving national builders. South Carolina courts apply a totality-of-the-circumstances test for unconscionability.
South Carolina Legal History
No state-specific litigation involving M/I Homes in South Carolina has been identified in public records as of this writing.
Relevant South Carolina Laws
South Carolina courts recognize an implied warranty of habitability for new construction. The South Carolina Supreme Court has held that contractual waivers of this warranty may be unconscionable.
Prohibits unfair or deceptive acts in trade or commerce, with potential for treble damages and attorney fees.
Requires homeowners to provide written notice to the builder and allow an opportunity to inspect and offer a repair before filing a construction defect lawsuit.
South Carolina Key Facts
- 1The South Carolina Supreme Court found habitability waiver clauses unconscionable in Smith v. D.R. Horton (2016).
- 2South Carolina's right-to-repair statute requires written notice before filing a construction defect lawsuit.
- 3Mandatory arbitration clauses have been found unconscionable in some South Carolina cases involving national builders.
- 4South Carolina has a statute of repose of 8 years for construction defect claims.
- 5The Residential Builders Commission licenses and regulates residential builders in South Carolina.
- 6South Carolina courts apply a totality-of-the-circumstances test for unconscionability of contract provisions.
What South Carolina Buyers Should Know
- Comply with South Carolina's right-to-repair notice requirement. South Carolina law requires written notice to the builder and an opportunity to inspect and repair before filing a construction defect lawsuit.
- Know that habitability waivers may be unenforceable. The South Carolina Supreme Court has found habitability waiver clauses unconscionable in cases involving national builders. M/I Homes' contractual warranty limitations may face similar challenges.
- Be aware of the 8-year statute of repose. South Carolina has an 8-year statute of repose for construction defect claims. Document defects promptly and consult an attorney to ensure timely filing.
- Compare M/I Financial with independent lenders. M/I Financial is a wholly owned subsidiary of M/I Homes. Compare rates, fees, and loan terms with at least two independent lenders before committing.